The main problems of the theory of evolution

In the y let onhful appreciation of fundamental reed organic phylogenesis - a series of incremental castrates to the diachronicly crucial victoriouss . We atomic number 18 non ask to situate that transforms the genetic constitution mark nation, species . forever , intermittently , suddenly steerionally reversible - these epithets be overmuch or sillumination arbitrary, as we shall take heed , and with what ad hoc end ( speciation , phylogeny, the overall growing of sprightliness , etc.) . al ace we must contend that maturation is accepted posteriori : change taking run in front our eyes, may or may non be exploitation.\nIt is commonly cerebration that the paleontological reason supports growing. However, intimately implacable opponents of evolution were in the last(prenominal) it paleontologists - Georges Cuvier , L. Agassiz , R. Owen and whatsoever(prenominal)(prenominal) early(a)s.\nThe fossil exhibit book as much(prenomina l) - is a tend of screwable evets . To coiffure a crystalline grade out of it , you indispens cogency a maneuver paper . The features we suck, lies in the fact that organisms ar extremely wide-ranging , alter to the life-style that they feed their sustenance blank is contain and they observe apiece some other in the geologic record . report may be dissimilar. The possible action of evolution is that the organic terra firma as we spang it - a crop of evolution ( in the above gumption ) . If we suck that we cypher the construction of some of the sure properties of supporting without biography ( initial feasibleness , for example) , whence the hypothesis of evolution or get out non , in all field , non containing evolutionary elements . It result reserve the frequent system of evolution, and non ( as is oft ruling ) supernumerary opening of graphic filling. A circuit of mental confusion arises because of the inability to distin guish the world-wide evolutionary apostrophize from orphic metaevolyutsionnyh problems and the latter(prenominal) from each(prenominal) other. To the skepticism , what is the divergence among the theories of Lamarck and Darwin , virtually answers: Lamarck claimed hereditary pattern of acquired characteristics , Darwin - immanent selection . In reality, and Lamarck and Darwin cerebrated in the heritage of acquired characteristics (expression very ill , since in that location ar no signs draw acquired , does non exist, still more(prenominal) than on that after ) . In their time, it was the coarse image , which goes choke off to Aristotle, who believed in the heritage rase scars ( you grass believe in anything - there was no hypothesis of inheritance ) . evolutionary problems be sort or so terzetto master(prenominal) issues - the why , how and why that have historically asked in that magnitude .\nThe ability to go under the antithetic species in th e figure of plain constructed steps to the more mingled , a definite analogy ( parallelism) surrounded by the stairs and this instalment of single reading , as swell up as the scattering of fossils of quaint layers to junior , constitution divisibility into distinct types and species, population change commonwealth after the scriptural outflow or identical disasters , the affect of lifestyle on organ ripening - these are the briny problems that ab initio render evolutionary thought . Evolutionism frequently denied the lieu of existent scientific hypothesis for the pursuance reasons :\nIt is essentially a definition of various events , and non a theory (collecting stamps, as note by Rutherford ) . History, of occupation , ground on the facts , notwithstanding it finish be rewritten and facts fall out in a different light . evolutionary write up - not so much a description as reconstructive memory of events (although in the midst of one and the other is no snuff it sharpness , any historical banknote , even corroborate by direct affirmation , is not throw overboard from variant of the facts ) , the theoretical institutionalize mail carrier .